本文主要是介绍Mark - JVM性能调优监控工具专题一:JVM自带性能调优工具(jps,jstack,jmap,jhat,jstat,hprof),希望对大家解决编程问题提供一定的参考价值,需要的开发者们随着小编来一起学习吧!
转载自: http://josh-persistence.iteye.com/blog/2161848
前提概要:
JDK本身提供了很多方便的JVM性能调优监控工具,除了集成式的VisualVM和jConsole外,还有jps、jstack、jmap、jhat、jstat、hprof等小巧的工具,每一种工具都有其自身的特点,用户可以根据你需要检测的应用或者程序片段的状况,适当的选择相应的工具进行检测。接下来的两个专题分别会讲VisualVM的具体应用。
现实企业级Java开发中,有时候我们会碰到下面这些问题:
-
OutOfMemoryError,内存不足
-
内存泄露
-
线程死锁
-
锁争用(Lock Contention)
-
Java进程消耗CPU过高
-
......
这些问题在日常开发中可能被很多人忽视(比如有的人遇到上面的问题只是重启服务器或者调大内存,而不会深究问题根源),但能够理解并解决这些问题是Java程序员进阶的必备要求。
一、 jps(Java Virtual Machine Process Status Tool) : 基础工具
实际中这是最常用的命令,下面要介绍的小工具更多的都是先要使用jps查看出当前有哪些Java进程,获取该Java进程的id后再对该进程进行处理。
jps主要用来输出JVM中运行的进程状态信息。语法格式如下:
jps [options] [hostid]
如果不指定hostid就默认为当前主机或服务器。
命令行参数选项说明如下:
-q 不输出类名、Jar名和传入main方法的参数
-m 输出传入main方法的参数
-l 输出main类或Jar的全限名
-v 输出传入JVM的参数
比如
1、我现在有一个WordCountTopo的Strom程序正在本机运行。
2、使用java -jar deadlock.jar & 启动一个线程死锁的程序
wangsheng@WANGSHENG-PC /E
$ jps -ml
14200 deadlock.jar
13952 com.wsheng.storm.topology.WordCountTopo D://input/ 3
13248 sun.tools.jps.Jps -ml
9728
二、 jstack jstack主要用来查看某个Java进程内的线程堆栈信息。语法格式如下:
jstack [option] pid
jstack [option] executable core
jstack [option] [server-id@]remote-hostname-or-ip
命令行参数选项说明如下:
-l long listings,会打印出额外的锁信息,在发生死锁时可以用<strong>jstack -l pid</strong>来观察锁持有情况
-m mixed mode,不仅会输出Java堆栈信息,还会输出C/C++堆栈信息(比如Native方法)
jstack可以定位到线程堆栈,根据堆栈信息我们可以定位到具体代码,所以它在JVM性能调优中使用得非常多。
下面我们来一个实例:
找出某个Java进程中最耗费CPU的Java线程并定位堆栈信息,用到的命令有ps、top、printf、jstack、grep。
第一步: 先找出Java进程ID,服务器上的Java应用名称为wordcount.jar:
[root@storm-master home]# ps -ef | grep wordcount | grep -v grep
root 2860 2547 13 02:09 pts/0 00:02:03 java -jar wordcount.jar /home/input 3
得到进程ID为2860,
第二步:找出该进程内最耗费CPU的线程,可以使用如下3个命令,这里我们使用第3个命令得出如下结果:
1)ps -Lfp pid : 即 ps -Lfp 2860
2)ps -mp pid -o THREAD, tid, time :即 ps -mp 2860 -o THREAD,tid,time
3)top -Hp pid: 即 <strong>top -Hp 2860</strong>
用第三个,输出如下:
TIME列就是各个Java线程耗费的CPU时间,显然CPU时间最长的是ID为2968的线程,用
printf "%x\n" 2968
得到2968的十六进制值为b98,下面会用到。
第三步:终于轮到jstack上场了,它用来输出进程2860的堆栈信息,然后根据线程ID的十六进制值grep,如下:
[root@storm-master home]# jstack 2860 | grep b98
"SessionTracker" prio=10 tid=0x00007f55a44e4800 nid=0xb53 in Object.wait() [0x00007f558e06c000
可以看到CPU消耗在SessionTracker这个类的Object.wait(),于是就能很容易的定位到相关的代码了。
三、 jmap(Memory Map)和 jhat(Java Heap Analysis Tool):
jmap导出堆内存,然后使用jhat来进行分析
jmap用来查看堆内存使用状况,一般结合jhat使用。
jmap语法格式如下:
jmap [option] pid
jmap [option] executable core
jmap [option] [server-id@]remote-hostname-or-ip
如果运行在64位JVM上,由于linux操作系统的不同,可能需要指定-J-d64命令选项参数。
1、打印进程的类加载器和类加载器加载的持久代对象信息: jmap -permstat pid
个人感觉这个不是太有用
输出:类加载器名称、对象是否存活(不可靠)、对象地址、父类加载器、已加载的类大小等信息,如图:
2、查看进程堆内存使用情况:包括使用的GC算法、堆配置参数和各代中堆内存使用:jmap -heap pid
比如下面的例子
[root@storm-master home]# jmap -heap 2860
Attaching to process ID 2860, please wait...
Debugger attached successfully.
Server compiler detected.
JVM version is 20.45-b01 using thread-local object allocation.
Mark Sweep Compact GC Heap Configuration: MinHeapFreeRatio = 40 MaxHeapFreeRatio = 70 MaxHeapSize = 257949696 (246.0MB) NewSize = 1310720 (1.25MB) MaxNewSize = 17592186044415 MB OldSize = 5439488 (5.1875MB) NewRatio = 2 SurvivorRatio = 8 PermSize = 21757952 (20.75MB) MaxPermSize = 85983232 (82.0MB) Heap Usage:
New Generation (Eden + 1 Survivor Space): capacity = 12189696 (11.625MB) used = 6769392 (6.4557952880859375MB) free = 5420304 (5.1692047119140625MB) 55.53372290826613% used
Eden Space: capacity = 10878976 (10.375MB) used = 6585608 (6.280525207519531MB) free = 4293368 (4.094474792480469MB) 60.53518272307982% used
From Space: capacity = 1310720 (1.25MB) used = 183784 (0.17527008056640625MB) free = 1126936 (1.0747299194335938MB) 14.0216064453125% used
To Space: capacity = 1310720 (1.25MB) used = 0 (0.0MB) free = 1310720 (1.25MB) 0.0% used
tenured generation: capacity = 26619904 (25.38671875MB) used = 15785896 (15.054603576660156MB) free = 10834008 (10.332115173339844MB) 59.30110040967841% used
Perm Generation: capacity = 33554432 (32.0MB) used = 33323352 (31.779624938964844MB) free = 231080 (0.22037506103515625MB) 99.31132793426514% used
3、查看堆内存中的对象数目、大小统计直方图,如果带上live则只统计活对象:jmap -histo[:live] pid
[root@storm-master Desktop]# jmap -histo 2860 num #instances #bytes class name
---------------------------------------------- 1: 13917 11432488 [B 2: 6117 6181448 <instanceKlassKlass> 3: 39520 6004504 <constMethodKlass> 4: 6117 5517072 <constantPoolKlass> 5: 39520 5383280 <methodKlass> 6: 5148 3150944 <constantPoolCacheKlass> 7: 29954 2810640 [C 8: 50179 2469272 <symbolKlass> 9: 42122 1791704 [Ljava.lang.Object; 10: 1804 961464 <methodDataKlass> 11: 11747 941200 [Ljava.util.HashMap$Entry; 12: 28786 921152 java.lang.String 13: 6347 660088 java.lang.Class 14: 7374 625616 [S 15: 11740 563520 java.util.HashMap 16: 23447 562728 clojure.lang.PersistentHashMap$BitmapIndexedNode 17: 10980 351360 clojure.lang.Symbol 18: 8544 341760 java.lang.ref.SoftReference 19: 8028 336632 [[I 20: 3944 283968 java.lang.reflect.Constructor 21: 4744 227712 java.nio.HeapByteBuffer 22: 6854 219328 java.util.AbstractList$Itr 23: 2185 195192 [I 24: 3854 184992 java.nio.HeapCharBuffer 25: 5500 176000 java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap$HashEntry
class name是对象类型,说明如下:
B byte
C char
D double
F float
I int
J long
Z boolean
[ 数组,如[I表示int[]
[L+类名 其他对象
4、还有一个很常用的情况是:用jmap把进程内存使用情况dump到文件中,再用jhat分析查看。需要注意的是 dump出来的文件还可以用MAT、VisualVM等工具查看。
jmap进行dump命令格式如下:
jmap -dump:format=b,file=dumpFileName pid
我一样地对上面进程ID为2860进行Dump:
[root@storm-master Desktop]# jmap -dump:format=b,file=/home/dump.dat 2860
Dumping heap to /home/dump.dat ...
Heap dump file created
然后使用jhat来对上面dump出来的内容进行分析
[root@storm-master Desktop]# jhat -port 8888 /home/dump.dat
Reading from /home/dump.dat...
Dump file created Sat Aug 01 04:21:12 PDT 2015
Snapshot read, resolving...
Resolving 411123 objects...
Chasing references, expect 82 dots..................................................................................
Eliminating duplicate references..................................................................................
Snapshot resolved.
Started HTTP server on port 8888
Server is ready.
注意如果Dump文件太大,可能需要加上-J-Xmx512m参数以指定最大堆内存,即jhat -J-Xmx512m -port 8888 /home/dump.dat。然后就可以在浏览器中输入主机地址:8888查看了:
点击每一个蓝色的超链接,你都会看到其相关更具体的信息,而最后一项更是支持OQL(对象查询语言)。
四、jstat(JVM统计监测工具): 看看各个区内存和GC的情况
语法格式如下:
jstat [ generalOption | outputOptions vmid [interval[s|ms] [count]] ]
vmid是Java虚拟机ID,在Linux/Unix系统上一般就是进程ID。interval是采样时间间隔。count是采样数目。比如下面输出的是GC信息,采样时间间隔为250ms,采样数为6:
[root@storm-master Desktop]# jstat -gc 2860 250 6
要明白上面各列的意义,先看JVM堆内存布局:
可以看出:
- 堆内存 = 年轻代 + 年老代 + 永久代
- 年轻代 = Eden区 + 两个Survivor区(From和To)
现在来解释各列含义:
S0C、S1C、S0U、S1U:Survivor 0/1区容量(Capacity)和使用量(Used)
EC、EU:Eden区容量和使用量
OC、OU:年老代容量和使用量
PC、PU:永久代容量和使用量
YGC、YGT:年轻代GC次数和GC耗时
FGC、FGCT:Full GC次数和Full GC耗时
GCT:GC总耗时
五、hprof(Heap/CPU Profiling Tool): hprof能够展现CPU使用率,统计堆内存使用情况。
HPROF: 一个Heap/CPU Profiling工具:J2SE中提供了一个简单的命令行工具来对java程序的cpu和heap进行 profiling,叫做HPROF。HPROF实际上是JVM中的一个native的库,它会在JVM启动的时候通过命令行参数来动态加载,并成为 JVM进程的一部分。若要在java进程启动的时候使用HPROF,用户可以通过各种命令行参数类型来使用HPROF对java进程的heap或者 (和)cpu进行profiling的功能。HPROF产生的profiling数据可以是二进制的,也可以是文本格式的。这些日志可以用来跟踪和分析 java进程的性能问题和瓶颈,解决内存使用上不优的地方或者程序实现上的不优之处。二进制格式的日志还可以被JVM中的HAT工具来进行浏览和分析,用 以观察java进程的heap中各种类型和数据的情况。在J2SE 5.0以后的版本中,HPROF已经被并入到一个叫做Java Virtual Machine Tool Interface(JVM TI)中。
语法格式如下:
java -agentlib:hprof[=options] ToBeProfiledClass
java -Xrunprof[:options] ToBeProfiledClass
javac -J-agentlib:hprof[=options] ToBeProfiledClass
完整的命令选项如下:
Option Name and Value Description Default
--------------------- ----------- -------
heap=dump|sites|all heap profiling all
cpu=samples|times|old CPU usage off
monitor=y|n monitor contention n
format=a|b text(txt) or binary output a
file=<file> write data to file java.hprof[.txt]
net=<host>:<port> send data over a socket off
depth=<size> stack trace depth 4
interval=<ms> sample interval in ms 10
cutoff=<value> output cutoff point 0.0001
lineno=y|n line number in traces? y
thread=y|n thread in traces? n
doe=y|n dump on exit? y
msa=y|n Solaris micro state accounting n
force=y|n force output to <file> y
verbose=y|n print messages about dumps y
- Get sample cpu information every 20 millisec, with a stack depth of 3:
java -agentlib:hprof=cpu=samples,interval=20,depth=3 classname
- Get heap usage information based on the allocation sites:
java -agentlib:hprof=heap=sites classname
上面每隔20毫秒采样CPU消耗信息,堆栈深度为3,生成的profile文件名称是java.hprof.txt,在当前目录。
默认情况下,java进程profiling的信息(sites和dump)都会被 写入到一个叫做java.hprof.txt的文件中。大多数情况下,该文件中都会对每个trace,threads,objects包含一个ID,每一 个ID代表一个不同的观察对象。通常,traces会从300000开始。 默认,force=y,会将所有的信息全部输出到output文件中,所以如果含有 多个JVMs都采用的HRPOF enable的方式运行,最好将force=n,这样能够将单独的JVM的profiling信息输出到不同的指定文件。 interval选项只在 cpu=samples的情况下生效,表示每隔多少毫秒对java进程的cpu使用情况进行一次采集。 msa选项仅仅在Solaris系统下才有效, 表示会使用Solaris下的Micro State Accounting功能
第二部分: 实例部分:
该部分将使用相关的实例和前面提到的JVM性能调优工具来进行性能诊断。
1、使用jstack来分析死锁问题:
上面说明中提到 jstack主要用来查看某个Java进程内的线程堆栈信息,您可以使用它查明问题。jstack [-l] <pid>,pid可以通过使用jps命令来查看当前Java程序的pid值,-l是可选参数,它可以显示线程阻塞/死锁情况
package com.wsheng.aggregator.thread.performance; import org.springframework.stereotype.Component; /** * Dead lock example * * @author Josh Wang(Sheng) * * @email josh_wang23@hotmail.com */
@Component
public class DeadLock { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println(" start the example ----- "); final Object obj_1 = new Object(), obj_2 = new Object(); Thread t1 = new Thread("t1") { @Override public void run() { synchronized (obj_1) { try { System.out.println("thread t1 start..."); Thread.sleep(3000); } catch (InterruptedException e) {e.printStackTrace();} synchronized (obj_2) { System.out.println("thread t1 done...."); } } } }; Thread t2 = new Thread("t2") { @Override public void run() { synchronized (obj_2) { try { System.out.println("thread t2 start..."); Thread.sleep(3000); } catch (InterruptedException e) {e.printStackTrace();} synchronized (obj_1) { System.out.println("thread t2 done..."); } } } }; t1.start(); t2.start(); } }
以上DeadLock类是一个死锁的例子,假使在我们不知情的情况下,运行DeadLock后,发现等了N久都没有在屏幕打印线程完成信息。这个时候我们就可以使用jps查看该程序的pid值和使用jstack来生产堆栈结果问题。
java -jar deadlock.jar com.wsheng.aggregator.thread.performance.DeadLock
$ jps 3076 Jps 448 DeadLock
$ jstack -l 448 > deadlock.jstack
结果文件deadlock.jstack内容如下:
2014-11-29 13:31:06
Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (24.65-b04 mixed mode): "Attach Listener" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d4002800 nid=0x440b waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "DestroyJavaVM" prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d4802000 nid=0x1903 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "t2" prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d30ac000 nid=0x5903 waiting for monitor entry [0x000000011da46000] java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor) at DeadLock$2.run(DeadLock.java:38) - waiting to lock <0x00000007aaba7e58> (a java.lang.Object) - locked <0x00000007aaba7e68> (a java.lang.Object) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "t1" prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d30ab800 nid=0x5703 waiting for monitor entry [0x000000011d943000] java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor) at DeadLock$1.run(DeadLock.java:23) - waiting to lock <0x00000007aaba7e68> (a java.lang.Object) - locked <0x00000007aaba7e58> (a java.lang.Object) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Service Thread" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d2809000 nid=0x5303 runnable [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "C2 CompilerThread1" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d304e000 nid=0x5103 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "C2 CompilerThread0" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d2800800 nid=0x4f03 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Signal Dispatcher" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d3035000 nid=0x4d03 runnable [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Finalizer" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d2013000 nid=0x3903 in Object.wait() [0x000000011d18d000] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on <0x00000007aaa85608> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:135) - locked <0x00000007aaa85608> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:151) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:209) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Reference Handler" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d2012000 nid=0x3703 in Object.wait() [0x000000011d08a000] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on <0x00000007aaa85190> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:503) at java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:133) - locked <0x00000007aaa85190> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "VM Thread" prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d5011000 nid=0x3503 runnable "GC task thread#0 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d200b000 nid=0x2503 runnable "GC task thread#1 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d200b800 nid=0x2703 runnable "GC task thread#2 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d200c800 nid=0x2903 runnable "GC task thread#3 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d200d000 nid=0x2b03 runnable "GC task thread#4 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d200d800 nid=0x2d03 runnable "GC task thread#5 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d200e000 nid=0x2f03 runnable "GC task thread#6 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d200f000 nid=0x3103 runnable "GC task thread#7 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d200f800 nid=0x3303 runnable "VM Periodic Task Thread" prio=5 tid=0x00007fd9d3033800 nid=0x5503 waiting on condition JNI global references: 114 <strong>Found one Java-level deadlock:</strong>
=============================
<strong>"t2": waiting to lock monitor 0x00007fd9d30aebb8 (object 0x00000007aaba7e58, a java.lang.Object), which is held by "t1"
"t1": waiting to lock monitor 0x00007fd9d28128b8 (object 0x00000007aaba7e68, a java.lang.Object), which is held by "t2" Java stack information for the threads listed above:</strong>
===================================================
"t2": at DeadLock$2.run(DeadLock.java:38) - waiting to lock <0x00000007aaba7e58> (a java.lang.Object) - locked <0x00000007aaba7e68> (a java.lang.Object)
"t1": at DeadLock$1.run(DeadLock.java:23) - waiting to lock <0x00000007aaba7e68> (a java.lang.Object) - locked <0x00000007aaba7e58> (a java.lang.Object) Found 1 deadlock.
从这个结果文件我们一看到发现了一个死锁,具体是线程t2在等待线程t1,而线程t1在等待线程t2造成的,同时也记录了线程的堆栈和代码行数,通过这个堆栈和行数我们就可以去检查对应的代码块,从而发现问题和解决问题。
可通过下面的代码解决死锁问题:
import java.util.concurrent.locks.Lock;
import java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock; /** * Dead lock example * * @author Josh Wang(Sheng) * * @email josh_wang23@hotmail.com */
public class DeadLock2Live { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println(" start the example ----- "); final Lock lock = new ReentrantLock(); Thread t1 = new Thread("t1") { @Override public void run() { try { lock.lock(); Thread.sleep(3000); System.out.println("thread t1 done."); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } finally { lock.unlock(); } } }; Thread t2 = new Thread("t2") { @Override public void run() { try { lock.lock(); Thread.sleep(3000); System.out.println("thread t2 done."); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } finally { lock.unlock(); } } }; t1.start(); t2.start(); }
}
2、继续使用jstack来分析HashMap在多线程情况下的死锁问题:
对于如下代码,使用10个线程来处理提交的2000个任务,每个任务会分别循环往hashmap中分别存入和取出1000个数,通过测试发现,程序并不能完整执行完成。[PS:该程序能不能成功执行完,有时也取决于所使用的服务器的运行状况,我在笔记本上测试的时候,大多时候该程序不能成功执行完成,有时会出现CPU转速加快,发热等情况]
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
/** * @author Josh Wang(Sheng) * * @email josh_wang23@hotmail.com */
public class HashMapDeadLock implements Callable<Integer> { private static ExecutorService threadPool = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10); private static Map<Integer, Integer> results = new HashMap<>(); @Override public Integer call() throws Exception { results.put(1, 1); results.put(2, 2); results.put(3, 3); for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { results.put(i, i); } Thread.sleep(1000); for (int i= 0; i < 1000; i++) { results.remove(i); } System.out.println(" ---- " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " " + results.get(0)); return results.get(1); } public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException { try { for (int i = 0; i < 2000; i++) { HashMapDeadLock hashMapDeadLock = new HashMapDeadLock();
// Future<Integer> future = threadPool.submit(hashMapDeadLock);
// future.get(); threadPool.submit(hashMapDeadLock); } } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } finally { threadPool.shutdown(); } }
}
1) 使用jps查看线程可得:
43221 Jps
30056
43125 HashMapDeadLock
2)使用jstack导出多线程栈区信息:
jstack -l 43125 > hash.jstack
3) hash.jstack的内容如下:
2014-11-29 18:14:22
Full thread dump Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (24.65-b04 mixed mode): "Attach Listener" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007f83ee08a000 nid=0x5d07 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "DestroyJavaVM" prio=5 tid=0x00007f83eb016800 nid=0x1903 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "pool-1-thread-10" prio=5 tid=0x00007f83ec80a000 nid=0x6903 runnable [0x000000011cd19000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE at java.util.HashMap.transfer(HashMap.java:601) at java.util.HashMap.resize(HashMap.java:581) at java.util.HashMap.addEntry(HashMap.java:879) at java.util.HashMap.put(HashMap.java:505) <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>at HashMapDeadLock.call(HashMapDeadLock.java:30) at HashMapDeadLock.call(HashMapDeadLock.java:1)</strong></span> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) Locked ownable synchronizers: - <0x00000007aaba84c8> (a java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker) "Service Thread" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007f83eb839800 nid=0x5303 runnable [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "C2 CompilerThread1" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007f83ee002000 nid=0x5103 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "C2 CompilerThread0" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007f83ee000000 nid=0x4f03 waiting on condition [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Signal Dispatcher" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007f83ec04c800 nid=0x4d03 runnable [0x0000000000000000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Finalizer" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007f83eb836800 nid=0x3903 in Object.wait() [0x000000011bc58000] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on <0x00000007aaa85608> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:135) - locked <0x00000007aaa85608> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:151) at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:209) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "Reference Handler" daemon prio=5 tid=0x00007f83eb01a800 nid=0x3703 in Object.wait() [0x000000011bb55000] java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) - waiting on <0x00000007aaa85190> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:503) at java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:133) - locked <0x00000007aaa85190> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None "VM Thread" prio=5 tid=0x00007f83ed808800 nid=0x3503 runnable "GC task thread#0 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007f83ec80d800 nid=0x2503 runnable "GC task thread#1 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007f83ec80e000 nid=0x2703 runnable "GC task thread#2 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007f83ec001000 nid=0x2903 runnable "GC task thread#3 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007f83ec002000 nid=0x2b03 runnable "GC task thread#4 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007f83ec002800 nid=0x2d03 runnable "GC task thread#5 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007f83ec003000 nid=0x2f03 runnable "GC task thread#6 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007f83ec003800 nid=0x3103 runnable "GC task thread#7 (ParallelGC)" prio=5 tid=0x00007f83ec004800 nid=0x3303 runnable "VM Periodic Task Thread" prio=5 tid=0x00007f83ec814800 nid=0x5503 waiting on condition JNI global references: 134
4)从红色高亮部分可看出,代码中的30行出问题了,即往hashmap中写入数据出问题了:
results.put(i, i);
很快就明白因为Hashmap不是线程安全的,所以问题就出在这个地方,我们可以使用线程安全的map即
ConcurrentHashMap后者HashTable来解决该问题:
import java.util.Map;
import java.util.concurrent.Callable;
import java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors; /** * */ /** * @author Josh Wang(Sheng) * * @email josh_wang23@hotmail.com */
public class HashMapDead2LiveLock implements Callable<Integer> { private static ExecutorService threadPool = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10); private static Map<Integer, Integer> results = new ConcurrentHashMap<>(); @Override public Integer call() throws Exception { results.put(1, 1); results.put(2, 2); results.put(3, 3); for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { results.put(i, i); } Thread.sleep(1000); for (int i= 0; i < 1000; i++) { results.remove(i); } System.out.println(" ---- " + Thread.currentThread().getName() + " " + results.get(0)); return results.get(1); } public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException { try { for (int i = 0; i < 2000; i++) { HashMapDead2LiveLock hashMapDeadLock = new HashMapDead2LiveLock();
// Future<Integer> future = threadPool.submit(hashMapDeadLock);
// future.get(); threadPool.submit(hashMapDeadLock); } } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } finally { threadPool.shutdown(); } }
}
改成ConcurrentHashMap后,重新执行该程序,你会发现很快该程序就执行完了。
这篇关于Mark - JVM性能调优监控工具专题一:JVM自带性能调优工具(jps,jstack,jmap,jhat,jstat,hprof)的文章就介绍到这儿,希望我们推荐的文章对编程师们有所帮助!