GRE官方给出满分的ARGUMENT北美范文

2024-08-29 22:58

本文主要是介绍GRE官方给出满分的ARGUMENT北美范文,希望对大家解决编程问题提供一定的参考价值,需要的开发者们随着小编来一起学习吧!

  下面是一篇GRE官方给出满分的ARGUMENT范文,我们来一起赏析,看看它为何能scored six (先读文章,再看我的点评

  The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:

  "Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money."

  Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

  北美GRE范文首段

  This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Howeveer, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expenses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the work environment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesn\'t necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree.

  北美GRE作文范文中间段1

  The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly increased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner with any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense.

  北美GRE范文中间段2

  This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations such as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds that it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relations they are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.

  北美GRE写作范文中间段3

  Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature.

  北美GRE范文末端

  In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of a company to improve that environment (i.e。, coal mine。 Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses.

  GRE这篇官方钦定满分的范文,其最明显的优点在于:

  1. 字数高达599words, GRE充分体现了字数为王的判分倾向。

  2. 标准的五段制,首段、GRE末端,中间三段,看上去很美。

  3. 没有陈词滥调、GRE满篇废话的模板式语言。

  只有以上三点离满分还是很远的,GRE之所以SIX,我看更重要的在于,每段各尽其责,既独立又统一,形成了完整的ARGUMENT,specifically:

  1. 首段再现了原TOPIC的推理过程,GRE并指出其assumptions多有不适;尤其令阅卷人高兴的是:首段在最后简化罗列了推理中的三个问题。要知道美国人就喜欢的作文---总分式,在首段就把三个ideas罗列出来,然后在中间三段分别展开,先总后分,一目了然。

  2. 中一的TS -- “The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment.”可谓是一针见血,一剑封喉。对于这样严重的推理漏洞,如果不首先指出,其argument必然软弱乏力。此所谓

  Topic中的 “必削点”,不可不察。

  3. 中二的TS – “This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment.”这可谓是剑走偏锋,独辟蹊径,出人所料。文章竟然批评了Topic以钱为本经营理念,提出了要以人为本,这样写是有一定风险,毕竟这不是Issue。

  那本文是如何化险为夷的呢?且看本段最后一句“this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees.”我不由得长舒一口,人家再次回归了,又回到了Topic中以“Money”为本的推理。

  4. 中三的TS – “Finally one must understand that not all work environments can be made safer.”这充分体现了作者不只是坐而论道的arguer,而是关心其可行性的现实主义者,考虑到方案本身的可行性和局限性。

  5. 末端不但对首段提出的论点做出了重复性的总结,GRE而且又不厌其烦地把中间三段的ideas一一罗列。如此“啰嗦”估计令某些同学略有不齿,但这恰恰是美国人的最爱,cultural shock了吧?

这篇关于GRE官方给出满分的ARGUMENT北美范文的文章就介绍到这儿,希望我们推荐的文章对编程师们有所帮助!



http://www.chinasem.cn/article/1119091

相关文章

活用c4d官方开发文档查询代码

当你问AI助手比如豆包,如何用python禁止掉xpresso标签时候,它会提示到 这时候要用到两个东西。https://developers.maxon.net/论坛搜索和开发文档 比如这里我就在官方找到正确的id描述 然后我就把参数标签换过来

Adblock Plus官方规则Easylist China说明与反馈贴(2015.12.15)

-------------------------------特别说明--------------------------------------- 视频广告问题:因Adblock Plus的局限,存在以下现象,优酷、搜狐、17173黑屏并倒数;乐视、爱奇艺播放广告。因为这些视频网站的Flash播放器被植入了检测代码,而Adblock Plus无法修改播放器。 如需同时使用ads

Temu官方宣导务必将所有的点位材料进行检测-RSL资质检测

关于饰品类产品合规问题宣导: 产品法规RSL要求 RSL测试是根据REACH法规及附录17的要求进行测试。REACH法规是欧洲一项重要的法规,其中包含许多对化学物质进行限制的规定和高度关注物质。 为了确保珠宝首饰的安全性,欧盟REACH法规规定,珠宝首饰上架各大电商平台前必须进行RSLReport(欧盟禁限用化学物质检测报告)资质认证,以确保产品不含对人体有害的化学物质。 RSL-铅,

Cortex-A7:ARM官方推荐的嵌套中断实现机制

0 参考资料 ARM Cortex-A(armV7)编程手册V4.0.pdf ARM体系结构与编程第2版 1 前言 Cortex-M系列内核MCU中断硬件原生支持嵌套中断,开发者不需要为了实现嵌套中断而进行额外的工作。但在Cortex-A7中,硬件原生是不支持嵌套中断的,这从Cortex-A7中断向量表中仅为外部中断设置了一个中断向量可以看出。本文介绍ARM官方推荐使用的嵌套中断实现机

长虹官方刷机包和刷机教程

为了解决部分朋友因应用引起的电视死机、无法开机、系统被破坏等情形,长虹电视团队特开此帖为朋友们提供刷机方法,但刷机有风险,如完全不懂刷机技巧的朋友需要谨慎操作哦,如有疑问可以微信留言给我们。       下面是按照电视机型、刷机方式、刷机包链接这样的方式提供的(目前暂放热门型号刷机教程)。

php官方下载地址

http://windows.php.net/downloads/releases/archives/

南卡科技“满分之选”全新开放式耳机发布,打造超越Pro的极致体验!

在音频技术的不断革新中,南卡品牌以其深厚的声学底蕴和对创新的不懈追求,再次为市场带来惊喜。今天,我们自豪地宣布,南卡OE Pro2开放式蓝牙耳机正式亮相,它不仅代表了南卡在开放式耳机领域的技术巅峰,更是对音质和佩戴舒适度的双重革新。 31°悬浮倾斜设计,无感佩戴的新高度 南卡OE Pro2将对耳机舒适性的诠释拉升到一个新境界,采用了开放式佩戴设计,彻底告别了传统耳机的堵塞感。基于上万耳

PHP各版本下载集合官方地址

https://windows.php.net/downloads/releases/archives/

《论软件设计模式及其应用》通关范文,软考高级系统架构设计师

论文真题 设计模式(Design Pattern)是一套被反复使用的代码设计经验总结,代表了软件开发人员在软件开发过程中面临的一般问题的解决方案和最佳实践。使用设计模式的目的是提高代码的可重用性,让代码更容易被他人理解,并保证代码可靠性。现有的设计模式已经在前人的系统中得以证实并广泛使用,它使代码编写真正实现工程化,将已证实的技术表述成设计模式,也会使新系统开发者更加容易理解其设计思路。根据

简单梳理UE4的Houdini官方插件代码

前言 Houdini官方插件名字叫 “Houdini Engine”,它搭建了Houdini数据与UE4数据间的桥梁。我接触这个插件已经有段时间了,我想是时候梳理一下插件的结构了。(当前我用的UE4版本是4.24.2,Houdini版本18.0.348) 需要说明的是,这篇博客主要是从代码出发的。我准备先分析插件整体的代码结构,再逐个翻阅每个文件试图搞明白他角色。但如果不准备研究代码结构和实现